The oppressed have at least the possibility of coming to know that the views of the masters rationalize and serve their Perspectivialism itself emerges as one particular insight open to the oppressed, to the Philosophy of Liberation. Is the Philosophy of Liberation, then, - pursuing Hegel's master-slave metaphor -the philosophy of slaves, of the dominated, of the oppressed and if so what particular insights does this perspective reveal that is lost to western philosophy? On this view, Western Philosophy is the philosophy of the masters of the world, of the dominant countries, cultures, and class. Its concepts, problems, and problematics are identified with philosophy itself and other perspectives, other positions, are condemned to the margins (Dussel, pp. One of the insights of the Philosophy of Liberation is that Western Philosophy is the philosophy of the center, of the metropoles, of white European males. The relationship between modern Western philosophy and the new Philosophy of Liberation which has emerged above all from Latin America. This passage strikes me as providing a useful opening to discuss all of this is denied to third world culture, which must be situational and materialist" (Jameson This placeless individuality, this structural idealism which affords us the luxury of the Sartrean blink, offers a welcome escape from the 'nightmare of history,' but at the same time it condemns our culture to psychologism and the 'projections' of private subjectivity. The view from the top is epistemologically crippling, and reduces its subjects to the illusions of a host of fragmented subjectivities. "It strikes me that we Americans, we masters of the world, are in something of that very same position. Elaborating on this analysis, Jameson writes:
On Hegel's theory, the slave "whats what reality and the resistance of matter really are" while the master "isĬondemned to idealism. In a 1986 article, "Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism," Fredric Jameson concludes his study by contrasting the "situational consciousness" of first and third worlds in terms of Hegel's master/slave dialectic. Only through this awareness can we break through the reified “solutions” that have often plagued the ecology movement, bringing about the urgent social and ecological transformation that our species requires for its liberation and long-term survival.Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, and the Philosophy of Liberation by Douglas Kellner We posit that systemic, interconnected and accelerating ecological crises (climatic, biospheric and oceanic) form the objective and absolute contradiction of contemporary global social life that compels an awareness of the potentialities of an ecological society. In particular, we offer critical reflections on the concept of “nature” in the contemporary ecology movement and illustrate how dialectical naturalism is capable of not only transcending dualistic conceptions of “man/nature” but in expanding our awareness of the potentialities of history along what Bookchin terms the “libertory pathways” to a restorative relation between human “second nature” and biological “first nature”. In the second half, we examine Murray Bookchin's conception of “dialectical naturalism” as a more thorough engagement with the human/nature relation that surpasses Marcuse's late engagements with ecologism. Here, we suggest the need for a more holistic dialectical understanding of the social totality-one that is directly located within, and takes as foundational, the environmental conditions of human society. In the first half of the article, we engage with Marcuse's application of the dialectical method in which he gestured to the “vital need” to push beyond the appearance of “the real” and yet lamented the loss of the ability for negative thinking to pierce the dominance of the “technical apparatus” that tied humanity to this “radical falsity”. The work of Herbert Marcuse and Murray Bookchin offers unique approaches to this question that remain highly relevant.
In the wake of ecological crises, there has been a resurgence of interest in the relation between dialectical thought and nature.
0 kommentar(er)
